* Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy
@ 2014-01-16 6:20 99% ` Sergey Popov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Sergey Popov @ 2014-01-16 6:20 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1054 bytes --]
15.01.2014 21:04, Tom Wijsman пишет:
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:40:20 +0400
> Sergey Popov <pinkbyte@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>> As i said earlier for similar proposals - the one option that i see
>> here to make all things going better - to recruit more people in arch
>> teams/arch testers. Other options lead us to nowhere, when stable
>> will be eliminated or transformed into fake.
>
> If eventually our existing approach yields no or worsening results, it
> would leads us nowhere as well; we can pick that option a few times,
> but if it doesn't improve anything we'll need to start reconsidering.
>
It can not go to no result, unless we have no breakages in stable,
stable REMAINS stable. If it contains old, but working software - then
it is stable.
As i said earlier, problem begins when we NEED to stabilize something to
prevent breakages and arch teams are slow.
--
Best regards, Sergey Popov
Gentoo developer
Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead
Gentoo Qt project lead
Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 555 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2014-01-14 21:37 [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy William Hubbs
2014-01-14 23:49 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-15 11:40 ` Sergey Popov
2014-01-15 17:04 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-16 6:20 99% ` Sergey Popov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox