* Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage ebuild cruft
@ 2005-04-29 14:11 99% ` Jason Wever
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Jason Wever @ 2005-04-29 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> The initialization time of portage is directly related to the number of
> packages installed. Cutting out excess ebuilds from the tree won't speed this
> up at all. Cutting out excess ebuilds won't have much effect on the general
> running of emerge at all, actually, except for updating the cache after
> syncing.
Does that include the about >=10 second delay when emerge is first run on
a box after a reboot before you get any visible output on the screen, or
is that an entirely different problem?
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCckCCdKvgdVioq28RAlJ6AJ0bf2NHAFr6Otc7v0HvbyqOlb7DDgCfYrTR
6tFh38nSUwVw6XDXvYnWmxk=
=ODsL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2005-04-28 16:40 [gentoo-dev] Portage ebuild cruft Heinrich Wendel
2005-04-28 23:17 ` Athul Acharya
2005-04-29 13:29 ` Jason Wever
2005-04-29 13:58 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-04-29 14:11 99% ` Jason Wever
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox