* Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
@ 2010-04-04 9:05 99% ` Petteri Räty
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Petteri Räty @ 2010-04-04 9:05 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 771 bytes --]
On 04/04/2010 12:35 AM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> Le samedi 03 avril 2010 à 12:50 +0300, Petteri Räty a écrit :
>> I don't think later is valid resolution. If there's a valid bug it just
>> means it's never looked at again. If the bug is not valid then a
>> different resolution should be used. So what do you think about
>> disabling later?
>
> You are trying to remove a valid status for a case that has been badly
> managed ??? Speaking for gnome herd, afaik, all bugs marked LATER are
> for the simple reason they will be done later and no other status would
> be fine expect REJECTED maybe, but we don't want to say that to the face
> of the reported like this do we ?
>
And why not just keep them open as suggested?
Regards,
Petteri
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 900 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2010-04-03 9:50 [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla? Petteri Räty
2010-04-03 21:35 ` Gilles Dartiguelongue
2010-04-04 9:05 99% ` Petteri Räty
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox