* [gentoo-dev] Re: Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
@ 2010-04-05 10:07 99% ` Peter Hjalmarsson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Peter Hjalmarsson @ 2010-04-05 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
mån 2010-04-05 klockan 03:54 +0300 skrev Mart Raudsepp:
> The problem is really the RESOLVED connotation and the hiding that goes
> along with that on searches, etc.
>
> The LATER status itself can be useful when used properly (more as
> "ASSIGNED LATER"). In the lack of that some bigger teams might need to
> think of other methods to get things meant for LATER out of main views
> of huge bug lists.
Actually I think this is the best yet.
I have always found the sounding of RESOLVED LATER so harsh. ASSIGNED
LATER would more sound like we know there is a problem, and we know it
should be fixed, but we cannot do it now for different reasons.
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2010-04-03 9:50 [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla? Petteri Räty
2010-04-05 0:54 ` Mart Raudsepp
2010-04-05 10:07 99% ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter Hjalmarsson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox