* [gentoo-dev] Re: Avoiding rebuilds
@ 2014-08-03 15:14 99% ` Martin Vaeth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Martin Vaeth @ 2014-08-03 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Steven J. Long <slong@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> wrote:
>
> collect your thoughts into a forum post
You are right: Not everybody on this list is interested in all
technical details, so it is perhaps better to shift this discussion
to the forums. I have opened the topic
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7593700.html#7593700
with a summary of the various suggestions (and a very rough sketch
of their advantages/disadvantages).
> Sounds like something that repoman could check, once a GLEP and impl
> are in place.
The problem I meant is that repoman is no able to check it:
It can be completely reasonable that the value of that metadata
variable is unchanged, that is, repoman should not even spit a
warning in this case.
Unless one "adds" an artificial mechanism (like encoding the revision
into the variable name or variable content) which *forces* the
maintainer to change/check that variable.
But any such mechanism I can think of is inconvenient and
possibly confusing.
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2014-07-22 7:25 [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2014-07-22 18:44 ` Kent Fredric
2014-07-26 14:12 ` [gentoo-dev] " Martin Vaeth
2014-07-26 22:43 ` Kent Fredric
2014-07-27 7:16 ` Martin Vaeth
2014-07-27 10:16 ` [gentoo-dev] Avoiding rebuilds (was: don't rely on dynamic deps) Ulrich Mueller
2014-07-27 13:45 ` [gentoo-dev] Avoiding rebuilds hasufell
2014-07-28 5:49 ` [gentoo-dev] " Martin Vaeth
2014-08-01 9:35 ` Steven J. Long
2014-08-01 20:49 ` Martin Vaeth
2014-08-02 13:19 ` Steven J. Long
2014-08-03 15:14 99% ` Martin Vaeth
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox