* Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage QOS
@ 2014-01-10 12:30 99% ` Igor
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Igor @ 2014-01-10 12:30 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Hello Heroxbd,
Friday, January 10, 2014, 4:16:47 AM, you wrote:
>> The ebuilds have approximately the same time to install, the failure
>> rate is about the same, emerge is getting slower.
> I am curious about the slowness of emerge.
> How about profile the portage and rewrite the time-crucial part in
> C/C++, or ideally, borrowing the counterpart from paludis? How feasible
> is that?
> I guess the dep-tree calculation is the slowest part.
And to think about it - Python is a slow big snake. And Gentoo is the
fastest of penguins.
So why do we send Gentoo for food riding on Python? If it were death
we send Gentoo for then I would choose Python but food?
Isn't it making them both slow and food isn't coming?
--
Best regards,
Igor mailto:lanthruster@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2014-01-09 7:24 [gentoo-dev] Portage QOS LTHR
2014-01-09 8:12 ` Alec Warner
2014-01-09 12:44 ` Igor
2014-01-09 14:12 ` Christopher Schwan
2014-01-09 15:26 ` Igor
2014-01-10 0:16 ` heroxbd
2014-01-10 12:30 99% ` Igor
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox