* Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: why are we still distributing the portage tree via rsync?
[not found] ` <20180703164113.724D6E0BA6@pigeon.gentoo.org>
@ 2018-07-03 16:51 99% ` Rich Freeman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Rich Freeman @ 2018-07-03 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 12:41 PM Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> I would expect as much. But my primary argument would be key management related, it is simply impossible to present a raw copy of our repo to end-users and have them verify each commit
>
While related, I think that the question of distribution is still a
fair one. We can still check an infra key on the head commit with git
distribution. Granted, if we want to go further than that then the
implementation will vary between git vs rsync distribution because the
signed git metadata is only available easily in git.
--
Rich
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2018-07-03 15:39 [gentoo-dev] rfc: why are we still distributing the portage tree via rsync? William Hubbs
[not found] ` <20180703164113.724D6E0BA6@pigeon.gentoo.org>
2018-07-03 16:51 99% ` Rich Freeman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox