* [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage 2.0.51 comments/questions
@ 2004-09-27 20:16 99% ` Duncan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Duncan @ 2004-09-27 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Paul de Vrieze posted <200409271101.42703.pauldv@gentoo.org>, excerpted
below, on Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:01:42 +0200:
> On Monday 27 September 2004 05:52, Duncan wrote:
>>
>> Evidently .51 is rather stricter in some things than .50 and a number
>> of things are QA Notices now that were silent, before. Are things to
>> the point where it's worthwhile bugging the various ebuilds that emit
>> these notices, illegal eclass inheritance and the like, or are there
>> still enough of them it'd just be unnecessary noise?
>
> If you could come up with patches for those ebuilds (or eclasses) then
> please post them to bugzilla. (We get the notices too) Without patches it
> is probably more of an annoyance than actually useful (most maintainers
> know about them).
Thanks. I figured something of that nature. My ability in that area is
somewhat limited and I haven't looked to see if it's within my range, yet,
so I'll avoid filing on them now. I had just seen enough of them to goad
me into asking, lest I be guilty of not giving back where I could, since
one thing I /can/ do is file bugs! <g>
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --
Benjamin Franklin
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2004-09-27 3:52 [gentoo-dev] Portage 2.0.51 comments/questions Duncan
2004-09-27 9:01 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-09-27 20:16 99% ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox