public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Search results ordered by [date|relevance]  view[summary|nested|Atom feed]
thread overview below | download: 
* [gentoo-dev] package with funny licence
@ 2007-07-03 10:21 99% Ulrich Mueller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Ulrich Mueller @ 2007-07-03 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

Today I stumbled over a package that has the following funny "licence"
in its file headers:

;; Bozoup(P) 1995 The Bozo(tic) Softwar(e) Founda(t)ion, Inc.
;; See the BOZO Antipasto for further information.
;; If this is useful to you, may you forever be blessed by the Holy Lord
;; Patty.  AT&T you will.

The package was marked as GPL-2 but I think this does not really hit
the spot. ;-)

Should I add the "BOZO Antipasto" [1] as a new licence, or is
LICENSE="as-is" sufficient here? [2]

Ulrich

[1] <http://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/BOZO>
[2] Yes, this is a serious question.
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[relevance 99%]

Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2007-07-03 10:21 99% [gentoo-dev] package with funny licence Ulrich Mueller

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox