* Re: [gentoo-dev] first council meeting
@ 2005-09-16 18:14 99% ` Martin Schlemmer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Martin Schlemmer @ 2005-09-16 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1094 bytes --]
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 19:42 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Friday 16 September 2005 00:20, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > actually this is came up in the meeting as something we would like to see
> > spelled out explicitly ... either as a GLEP itself or as a policy update to
> > current stabilization practices
> >
> > the GLEP was approved on the grounds that we need an x86 team and that it
> > needs to be treated as any other arch ... arch team interaction with
> > maintainers should be spelled out clearly rather than part of a single
> > sentence '... or make individual arrangements with the x86 arch team.'
>
> Ok, I do think that we will need a way for the maintainer to indicate that the
> package is stable. I'd be happy to leave stabilizing out of my hands, but I
> wouldn't want my packages to be stabilized before I deem it stable.
>
File a bug if the arches (or main ones at least) haven't picked it up
yet? Will make the problem of missing some or other keyword minimal
(especially for some obscure package not often used).
--
Martin Schlemmer
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2005-09-15 20:51 [gentoo-dev] first council meeting Aron Griffis
2005-09-15 21:57 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-09-15 22:20 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-09-16 17:42 ` Paul de Vrieze
2005-09-16 18:14 99% ` Martin Schlemmer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox