* Re: [gentoo-dev] reason for dhcpcd in system profile ?
@ 2003-08-25 3:07 99% ` Luke-Jr
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Luke-Jr @ 2003-08-25 3:07 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Spider, gentoo-dev, Alec Berryman
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
*multiple replies below*
On Sunday 24 August 2003 08:59 am, Spider wrote:
> Shouldn't system be as close to a POSIX compliant Unix as possible? Or
> perhaps LSB? If others want minimalism, let them create their own
> profiles?(Its not difficult. really).
Oh no... That means 'rpm' is going to be in system?!?! :-/
On Sunday 24 August 2003 04:32 pm, Alec Berryman wrote:
> Some interesting programs I found under the "Commands & Utilities"
> section of the LSB
> (http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/refspecs/LSB_1.3.0/gLSB/gLSB.html#TOCCOMMAND
>):
>
> crontab
Following the installation guide, this will be installed. To include it in
system would mean the install guide would have to install the cron app before
system, which may or may not work.
> egrep & fgrep
grep provides both of these. egrep is short for grep -e... not sure what fgrep
is.
> lpr
See comment about cron implementations. CUPS provides 'lpr', and I'm sure the
non-CUPS printing stuff probably does too.
> make
This is likely already in system...
> man
Ok, this would be a reason to include 'man', but are man-pages required by the
LSB?
> rsync
Surprised to see rsync... Except for Gentoo, does anyone really use this on a
common basis?
> tar
Probably already in system also.
>
> Note that the LSB does not include bzip.
Then the LSB is obsolete. =p
Seriously, though, this is probably because bzip has it's own custom license
which some GNU/Linux distributions might not want to require. As it is, a
normal desktop Gentoo system requires accepting around 14 or 15 licenses.
On Sunday 24 August 2003 06:40 pm, Alec Berryman wrote:
> I know there's already been one anti-Mandrake comment in this thread,
> but they have an 'lsb' package that depends on all of the LSB
> components. It is optional but recommended if I remember correctly.
> Perhaps that would be easier to maintain than a fully-LSB-compliant
> profile.
Or, more like what Mandrake does and perhaps better, have a 'lsb' package
which simply DEPENDs on all LSB-required applications. This would be better
than another profile, IMO.
- --
Luke-Jr
Developer, Gentoo Linux
http://www.gentoo.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/SX1qZl/BHdU+lYMRAtwOAJ4rYGXw6fRkxG+KMkwQ2IqPgCbg2wCeIcl2
tHlw7uvfF5isCZoV9awX/pY=
=7prV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2003-08-23 19:04 [gentoo-dev] reason for dhcpcd in system profile ? Marius Mauch
2003-08-24 3:21 ` A. Craig West
2003-08-24 8:59 ` Spider
2003-08-25 3:07 99% ` Luke-Jr
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox