public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Search results ordered by [date|relevance]  view[summary|nested|Atom feed]
thread overview below | download: 
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Are there valid uses for repoman --ignore-other-arches?
  @ 2005-11-27 16:53 99% ` Mike Frysinger
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2005-11-27 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 06:08:53PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
>  --ignore-other-arches Instructs repoman to ignore arches that are not
> relevent to the committing arch. REPORT/FIX issues you work around.
> 
> Are there any valid uses for this switch or can it be deprecated? From a
> QA point of view this seems like a very bad option.

uhh yeah, like people who want to commit a fix unrelated to any arch
breakage someone else may have caused

arch breakage is for arch teams to worry over ... without the -I
option, maintainers are basically fucked and unable to commit any fixes
until the arch issue is resolved

and in case i wasnt clear, i'd be very against removing this
-mike
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[relevance 99%]

Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2005-11-27 16:08     [gentoo-dev] Are there valid uses for repoman --ignore-other-arches? Petteri Räty
2005-11-27 16:53 99% ` Mike Frysinger

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox