* Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "Stable" Portage/Releases
@ 2006-01-08 14:45 99% ` Donnie Berkholz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Donnie Berkholz @ 2006-01-08 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Muraco wrote:
| Another thing that I don't like, is the feel of this method does seem
| "offical" enough.. mostly because portage is not 'stable'-aware, Its
| just using a stripped down tree.
What do you want then? If an entire standalone tree distributed by
Gentoo doesn't feel official enough, what will?
Thanks,
Donnie
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDwSWAXVaO67S1rtsRAo7rAJ9YAf+Z3UUsshKfURP71lKqL5PjLwCdGcem
czZJv0hCE0XbT9pjjZOtaiY=
=GdT8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2006-01-06 19:18 [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "Stable" Portage/Releases Chris Gianelloni
2006-01-08 7:09 ` Andrew Muraco
2006-01-08 14:45 99% ` Donnie Berkholz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox