* Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?
@ 2004-09-19 20:06 99% ` Dan Armak
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Dan Armak @ 2004-09-19 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1211 bytes --]
On Sunday 19 September 2004 22:50, Thomas Weidner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think all know /usr/qt and /usr/kde conflicts with the FHS, but it's
> there in order to make it possible to have several versions of kde/qt
> installed side by side. If there was a way to make qt and kde
> installations FHS compilant without removing the possibility to have
> several versions installed side by side,whould there be any interest to
> add it to portage or want gentoo developers to stick with the current
> solution? I know the current version works, but it conflicts with the
> FHS (and therefore with the LSB).
/usr/qt,kde was my decision at the time. I didn't see any obvious better
FHS-mandated place to put them in. If there's a better place, I'd at least
like to hear about it.
If it's a matter of simply moving the /usr/{qt,kde}/$VERSION directories
anywhere else, that's as simple as setting a few env variables before an
emerge, and changing their default vaules in eclasses or whereever.
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Matan, Israel
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2004-09-19 19:50 [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? Thomas Weidner
2004-09-19 20:06 99% ` Dan Armak
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox