* Re: [gentoo-dev] Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives
@ 2009-02-26 18:56 99% ` Ciaran McCreesh
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Ciaran McCreesh @ 2009-02-26 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 426 bytes --]
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:17:36 +0530
Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Is the following a stricter subset of your wording? --
>
> "EAPI must be set in an ebuild as the first non-comment line, and
> thereafter must not be set to a different value"
No. With your wording, the following are legal:
EAPI=$(echo 1 )
EAPI=${PV}
EAPI=$( a=() ; a+=3 ; echo ${a[0]} )
--
Ciaran McCreesh
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2009-02-24 22:21 [gentoo-dev] Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives Petteri Räty
2009-02-26 18:07 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-02-26 18:20 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-02-26 18:47 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-02-26 18:56 99% ` Ciaran McCreesh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox