* [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy
@ 2014-01-23 18:12 99% ` Steven J. Long
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Steven J. Long @ 2014-01-23 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jan 2014, Christopher Head wrote:
> > If stable really is falling behind and the backlog is always growing,
> > obviously something has to be done. I just don't want "something" to
> > mean "don't have a stable tree". The stable tree provides me with a
> > benefit. If standards have to slip a bit to maintain timeliness, then
> > I'd prefer a stable tree that's as stable as practical, accepting
> > reality-- perhaps where users are able to submit reports of working
> > packages, or where we let platform-agnostic packages be stabilized
> > after one arch has tested, or various of the other suggestions in this
> > thread. Just not no stable tree at all.
>
> +1 as long as we can find effort and ways to keep it around.
What? Without a stable tree, Gentoo is useless afaic.
I don't think that's what was being proposed, though. The question was
really the old complaint about slow architectures; the "-* arch"
solution sounds like the most reasonable definition of "dropping"
keywords, in the absence of AT communication otherwise.
--
#friendly-coders -- We're friendly, but we're not /that/ friendly ;-)
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2014-01-15 1:11 [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy Michael Orlitzky
2014-01-15 1:23 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-15 1:36 ` Michael Orlitzky
2014-01-15 2:09 ` William Hubbs
2014-01-15 2:21 ` Michael Orlitzky
2014-01-15 2:46 ` William Hubbs
2014-01-16 7:28 ` Christopher Head
2014-01-16 22:44 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-19 22:31 ` Christopher Head
2014-01-20 0:47 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-23 18:12 99% ` [gentoo-dev] " Steven J. Long
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox