* [gentoo-dev] Re: The usefulness of test in FEATURES
@ 2005-05-01 7:27 99% ` R Hill
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: R Hill @ 2005-05-01 7:27 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> maillog: 30/04/2005-13:43:42(-0600): R Hill types
>
>>Maybe a way of lessening the annoyance of test failures would be having
>>a way to resume the build at the install phase. I'm thinking of
>>something similar the touch ${BUILDDIR}/.compiled trick. as it is, if
>>you remove test from FEATURES, touch .tested, and then 'ebuild
>>foo.ebuild install' the tests still run. This is especially frustrating
>>when you've just spent 6 hours compiling a package to have it fail
>>because of sandboxing.
>
>
> You probably also need to edit ${T}/environment for the ebuild and
> remove test from FEATURES there as well. In fact, this is *the* location
> that you should probably touch.
Cool. So this is as simple as "sed -i -e 's@\(^FEATURES.*\)
test\(.*$\)@\1\2@g' /var/tmp/portage/pkgname/temp/environment" then.
Thanks. =]
--de.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2005-04-30 13:48 [gentoo-dev] The usefulness of test in FEATURES Maurice van der Pot
2005-04-30 19:43 ` [gentoo-dev] " R Hill
2005-05-01 1:27 ` Georgi Georgiev
2005-05-01 7:27 99% ` R Hill
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox