* Re: [gentoo-dev] Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives
@ 2009-02-26 19:24 99% ` Ciaran McCreesh
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Ciaran McCreesh @ 2009-02-26 19:24 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 854 bytes --]
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:46:04 +0530
Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Ah, I thought I might be missing something. Then how about:
>
> "EAPI must be set in an ebuild as the first non-comment line, such
> that bash does not perform any expansions during the assignment, and
> thereafter must not be set to a different value"
Close, but no banana. You've also got to specify that any syntax used
up to and including that line has to be bash-3 legal.
The problem is... If bash-5 introduces multi-line comments or a new
assignment syntax, your version doesn't forbid:
#* Copyright etc
more multiline stuff
*#
let EAPI = 3
Unfortunately, we have to care about these things when doing the formal
spec... There're developers who'll pull all kinds of insane crap in the
tree...
--
Ciaran McCreesh
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2009-02-24 22:21 [gentoo-dev] Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives Petteri Räty
2009-02-26 18:07 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-02-26 18:20 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-02-26 18:47 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-02-26 18:56 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-02-26 19:16 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-02-26 19:24 99% ` Ciaran McCreesh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox