* Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugs that have been resolved?
@ 2002-06-09 19:04 99% ` Magnus Therning
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Magnus Therning @ 2002-06-09 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1194 bytes --]
Martin Schlemmer (azarah@gentoo.org) beat me to it :-)
Geez, you guys are fast!
/M
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 06:49:49PM +0300, Dan Armak wrote:
> On Saturday 08 June 2002 19:17, Magnus Therning wrote:
> > What does one do in this situation?
> > If one stumbles across a bug that seems to be resolved, but one isn't
> > trusted to mark bugs as resolved in bugzilla.
>
> Add a comment to the bug saying that it's resolved etc. and wait for the
> asignee to close it. It will happen eventually, and open bugs for resolved
> problems aren't very problematic if their comments say that the problem is at
> least "apparently" resolved.
>
> >
> > I am referring to bugzilla bug 2100.
> >
> > /M
>
> --
> Dan Armak
> Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
> Matan, Israel
>
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
>
--
Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0x6A83A7DF)
magnus.therning@wanadoo.nl
http://www.lysator.liu.se/~magus/
Don't comment bad code - rewrite it.
- The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plaugher)
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2002-06-08 16:17 [gentoo-dev] Bugs that have been resolved? Magnus Therning
2002-06-08 15:49 ` Dan Armak
2002-06-09 19:04 99% ` Magnus Therning
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox