* Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: re-organizing our source mirrors into two categories: full and partial
@ 2003-07-27 10:05 99% ` bdharring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: bdharring @ 2003-07-27 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Kurt Lieber; +Cc: gentoo-dev
On Saturday, July 26, 2003, at 07:37 AM, Kurt Lieber wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 09:33:07AM -0500 or thereabouts, bdharring
> wrote:
>> Also, are you advocating the distfile mirrors carry a *complete*
>> distfile mirror, or a partial? I'm curious what the space savings
>> would be...
>
> Distfile mirrors would be required to carry the full /distfiles
> directory.
What space savings are avoided by not carrying the portage tree? Last
I had checked, I believe the tree was roughly in the range of 100mbs or
so.
I guess I'm curious if I'm missing something, since 100 mb's (if I'm
correct) while is a space saving, it really isn't all that much in
comparison to the distfile dir....
~bdh
>
> --kurt
> <mime-attachment>
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2003-07-26 12:37 [gentoo-dev] Proposal: re-organizing our source mirrors into two categories: full and partial Kurt Lieber
2003-07-27 10:05 99% ` bdharring
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox