public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Search results ordered by [date|relevance]  view[summary|nested|Atom feed]
thread overview below | download: 
* Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA bashism check on portage
  @ 2009-02-25 22:45 99% ` Mike Frysinger
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2009-02-25 22:45 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: Timothy Redaelli

On Wednesday 25 February 2009 11:10:01 Timothy Redaelli wrote:
> what do you think about checking for bashism on install_qa_check?
> Obviously only for scripts with #!/bin/sh and #!/sbin/runscript as first
> line.
>
> I think checkbashisms.pl [1] could be a good start point.
>
> [1] http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/devscripts/trunk/scripts/checkbashisms.pl

i recall it being incorrect in some cases (it checked for what dash supports, 
not what POSIX supports), but that was a while ago, so maybe my experience is 
dated at this point.  otherwise, integrating it sounds sane to me, and if we 
can push fixes back to debian, even better.

a repoman check on files in files/ would be useful as well i'd think
-mike



^ permalink raw reply	[relevance 99%]

Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2009-02-25 16:10     [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA bashism check on portage Timothy Redaelli
2009-02-25 22:45 99% ` Mike Frysinger

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox