* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status
@ 2014-01-10 22:20 99% ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2014-01-10 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 748 bytes --]
On Thursday 09 January 2014 15:24:00 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> On 9 January 2014 20:20, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > well, the sep herd was kind of by design ... i didn't want it cluttering
> > up base-system@ and it is super convenient to abdicate all PAM decisions
> > to a single herd.
>
> Yeah the problem has been that the herd has been fundamentally a single
> person, and when said single person asked for the rest of the users
> of/providers for PAM to accentrate on a single package, they ignored/worked
> around problems instead of reporting/discussing them.
how would moving it to base-system make any difference ? people doing it wrong
wouldn't really care which herd pam itself is owned by.
-mike
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2013-12-09 14:20 [gentoo-dev] About pam herd status Pacho Ramos
2014-01-09 20:20 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Frysinger
2014-01-09 20:24 ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2014-01-10 22:20 99% ` Mike Frysinger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox