* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-p2p/transmission: transmission-2.12.ebuild
@ 2011-04-29 18:40 99% ` Matt Turner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Matt Turner @ 2011-04-29 18:40 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 04/29/2011 09:26 PM, Mark Loeser wrote:
>> "Samuli Suominen (ssuominen)" <ssuominen@gentoo.org> said:
>>> ssuominen 11/04/29 18:13:31
>>>
>>> Removed: transmission-2.12.ebuild
>>> Log:
>>> drop old, broken with stable libnotify
>>>
>>> (Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha30/cvs/Linux x86_64, RepoMan options: --force)
>>
>> When removing an ebuild, please do document it in the ChangeLog.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>
> no thanks
Posts like these just make me want to unsubscribe.
Is there actually some debate as to whether ebuild removals should be
documented in the ChangeLog? Why shouldn't this be done? It hardly
takes any time at all.
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
[not found] <20110429181331.3C12720054@flycatcher.gentoo.org>
2011-04-29 18:26 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-p2p/transmission: transmission-2.12.ebuild Mark Loeser
2011-04-29 18:34 ` Samuli Suominen
2011-04-29 18:40 99% ` Matt Turner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox