* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-p2p/transmission: transmission-2.12.ebuild
@ 2011-04-30 0:49 99% ` William Hubbs
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: William Hubbs @ 2011-04-30 0:49 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1101 bytes --]
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 02:40:49PM -0400, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On 04/29/2011 09:26 PM, Mark Loeser wrote:
> >> "Samuli Suominen (ssuominen)" <ssuominen@gentoo.org> said:
> >>> ssuominen 11/04/29 18:13:31
> >>>
> >>> Removed: transmission-2.12.ebuild
> >>> Log:
> >>> drop old, broken with stable libnotify
> >>>
> >>> (Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha30/cvs/Linux x86_64, RepoMan options: --force)
> >>
> >> When removing an ebuild, please do document it in the ChangeLog.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >
> > no thanks
>
> Posts like these just make me want to unsubscribe.
>
> Is there actually some debate as to whether ebuild removals should be
> documented in the ChangeLog? Why shouldn't this be done? It hardly
> takes any time at all.
Not that I know of. AFAIK, all changes made to ebuilds are supposed to
be documented in the ChangeLog. That includes version bumps, removals,
stabilizations, everything.
No, there is no good reason not to do this.
William
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
[not found] <20110429181331.3C12720054@flycatcher.gentoo.org>
2011-04-29 18:26 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-p2p/transmission: transmission-2.12.ebuild Mark Loeser
2011-04-29 18:34 ` Samuli Suominen
2011-04-29 18:40 ` Matt Turner
2011-04-30 0:49 99% ` William Hubbs
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox