* Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata revised - removal of packages
@ 2005-09-09 12:24 99% ` Jakub Moc
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Jakub Moc @ 2005-09-09 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Torsten Veller
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1111 bytes --]
9.9.2005, 11:58:21, Torsten Veller wrote:
> Well, i was told that adding the maintainer-needed herd is not a good
> idea and it is best to remove metadata.xml if no valuable information
> remains.
> I couldn't find information on that. Can somebody explain?
I don't understand this idea on removing metadata.xml. There are lots of
packages with bug-wranglers@gentoo.org as herd in metadata. Removing
metadata.xml is IMHO a really bad idea. Just will make me look at the
ChangeLog, assign to maintainer-needed and CC someone who has touched the
ebuild most often.
> 2)
> What is the next step after the last maintainer is removed from metadata.xml?
> Well i announced these packages on -dev. Now i can wait some time (how
> long?) and then?
Put maintainer-needed in herd seems a logical solution to me. Hmmm. Maybe I
missed something?
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:jakub@gentoo.org
GPG signature: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
... still no signature ;)
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 183 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2005-09-09 9:58 [gentoo-dev] metadata revised - removal of packages Torsten Veller
2005-09-09 12:24 99% ` Jakub Moc
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox