* Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
@ 2010-04-05 17:58 99% ` Denis Dupeyron
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Denis Dupeyron @ 2010-04-05 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
<jmbsvicetto@gentoo.org> wrote:
> I disagree. Resolved LATER is useful to some maintainers that want to
> fix that bug, but don't have time or don't find the issue to be a
> priority at the moment. By marking it LATER they're acknowledging the
> bug exists and needs to be taken care of.
Reassigning the bug to yourself (or the herd) if necessary, accepting
it, and then explaining what/who/why/etc in a comment is the way to go
in that case. No system, however good it is, will replace proper
communication.
Denis.
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2010-04-03 9:50 [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla? Petteri Räty
2010-04-03 15:25 ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2010-04-05 17:58 99% ` Denis Dupeyron
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox