* Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy
@ 2014-01-15 2:21 99% ` Michael Orlitzky
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Michael Orlitzky @ 2014-01-15 2:21 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On 01/14/2014 09:09 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> After the package has been sitting in ~arch for 90 days with an open
> stable request with no blockers that the arch team has not taken any
> action on. We are not talking about randomly yanking package versions,
> just doing something when arch teams are not responsive, and it seems
> that the cleanest thing to do would be to remove the old versions.
>
People running stable value... stability. I would much rather wait for
the arch teams to get un-busy than to be forced to upgrade to something
untested. Why would I care if it takes another month? Strictly from a
user's perspective. I don't, unless I do, in which case I know that I
do, and I could just keyword the thing if I wanted to.
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2014-01-14 21:37 [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy William Hubbs
2014-01-14 21:57 ` Michael Orlitzky
2014-01-14 22:33 ` William Hubbs
2014-01-14 22:43 ` Michael Orlitzky
2014-01-14 23:11 ` William Hubbs
2014-01-15 0:47 ` Michael Orlitzky
2014-01-15 1:08 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-15 1:11 ` Michael Orlitzky
2014-01-15 1:23 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-15 1:36 ` Michael Orlitzky
2014-01-15 2:09 ` William Hubbs
2014-01-15 2:21 99% ` Michael Orlitzky
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox