* Re: [gentoo-dev] [git migration] The problem of ChangeLog generation
@ 2010-04-13 16:33 99% ` Matti Bickel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Matti Bickel @ 2010-04-13 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 868 bytes --]
Alec Warner wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Matti Bickel <mabi@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
>>> From my PoV, editing ChangeLog is like editing history. Complete no-no.
>> It is possible in all major SCMs for a reason. And I (as a user) would
>> laugh at Changelog entries saying "um, I got that bug number wrong, it
>> is really #1234". If I (as a developer) log such edits, I'm wasting my
>> users time.
>
> Its not possible in perforce once your change has been submitted.
Oh, missed that one. Maybe that makes perforce more "auditble" or whatnot.
I rather like the changelogs auto-generated. A method to link my git
commit to bugzie would be awesome. I *do* envy debian and others for the
auto bughandling they have. Previewing more than a raw number would also
reduce (not eliminate) the errors committed, i guess.
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 260 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2010-04-06 2:13 [gentoo-dev] [git migration] The problem of ChangeLog generation Nirbheek Chauhan
2010-04-13 11:25 ` Peter Volkov
2010-04-13 11:48 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2010-04-13 13:19 ` Ulrich Mueller
2010-04-13 13:35 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2010-04-13 16:12 ` Matti Bickel
2010-04-13 16:23 ` Alec Warner
2010-04-13 16:33 99% ` Matti Bickel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox