public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Search results ordered by [date|relevance]  view[summary|nested|Atom feed]
thread overview below | download: 
* [gentoo-dev] Should that file be a License ?
@ 2009-02-21 15:21 99% Mounir Lamouri
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Mounir Lamouri @ 2009-02-21 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

Hi,

I was writing a trivial version bump for net-voip/gnugk-2.2.8 (bug
#258518) but upstream added a file named p2pnat_license.txt (see
http://dpaste.com/123376/) This file looks to authorize gnugk project
(and users) to use p2pnat technology. gnugk is already licensed under
GPL-2 and I was wondering if this new file should be considered as
another license and if it has to be in the LICENSE line ? In this case,
should the file be added like he is in the gnugk tarball or should it be
"templatized" like most licenses ?

Thanks,
Mounir



^ permalink raw reply	[relevance 99%]

Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2009-02-21 15:21 99% [gentoo-dev] Should that file be a License ? Mounir Lamouri

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox