public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Search results ordered by [date|relevance]  view[summary|nested|Atom feed]
thread overview below | download: 
* Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy
  @ 2014-01-14 22:33 99%   ` William Hubbs
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: William Hubbs @ 2014-01-14 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 634 bytes --]

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:57:30PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 01/14/2014 04:37 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > 
> > 2. I would like to see the policy below applied to all arch's [2].
> 
> [ ] Yup
> [X] Nope

The reverse of this would be to let maintainers stabilize on all arch's
after 90 days, then they are allowed to remove all but the latest stable
version. This isn't good though because maintainers would be stabilizing
packages on arch's where they can't test.

The stable tree is significantly behind because the arch teams are so
short staffed, and this prooposal is an attempt to fix that.

William


[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[relevance 99%]

Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2014-01-14 21:37     [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy William Hubbs
2014-01-14 21:57     ` Michael Orlitzky
2014-01-14 22:33 99%   ` William Hubbs

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox