* [gentoo-dev] Re: Moving some packages around
@ 2008-05-12 1:46 99% ` Ryan Hill
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Ryan Hill @ 2008-05-12 1:46 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1364 bytes --]
On Mon, 12 May 2008 02:58:55 +0200
flameeyes@gmail.com (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) wrote:
> - bison and flex should get out of the system package set, what
> clearer than moving them out of sys-*? They are not so commonly used
> so there should no compelling reason to have them installed on every
> system;
both are required to build our toolchain.
> - gdb is not part of the system, this might be a problem for
> crossdev...;
it's part of the sourceware tree. i think it should stay in sys.
> sys-devel/patch -> app-text/patch
:(
> sys-devel/gettext -> app-i18n/gettext (well, it's part of system for
> G/FBSD, but I'd rather have deps expressed properly...)
:( (ok, less so than the one above)
> sys-devel/distcc -> dev-util/distcc
> sys-devel/icecream -> dev-util/icecream
sys-cluster?
> Yes these are a lot of moves, sincerely I think sys-* categories are a
> bit bloated as they are, and I suppose we should start moving the
> things around rather than waiting forever ad ever..
I guess I don't see the point. If you do move them, don't forget about
documentation changes.
--
fonts, gcc-porting, by design, by neglect
mips, treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2008-05-12 0:58 [gentoo-dev] Moving some packages around Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2008-05-12 1:46 99% ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox