* Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA bashism check on portage
@ 2009-02-26 9:27 99% ` Timothy Redaelli
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Timothy Redaelli @ 2009-02-26 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: Mike Frysinger
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1075 bytes --]
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 23:45:41 Mike Frysinger wrote:
<cut>
> i recall it being incorrect in some cases (it checked for what dash
> supports, not what POSIX supports), but that was a while ago, so maybe my
> experience is dated at this point. otherwise, integrating it sounds sane
> to me, and if we can push fixes back to debian, even better.
It does not fail, the problem is that some construct works only on some shells
or systems (for example type and kill -HUP warnings).
Maybe we should add a getopt flag (-q for example) to mask that types of
warnings, or maybe we should (for Gentoo/Alt) adapt files to be (almost)
POSIX compliant (so command -v instead of type, kill -s HUP instead of
kill -HUP, and go on)
> a repoman check on files in files/ would be useful as well i'd think
Yes, as supplementary check
--
Timothy `Drizzt` Redaelli
FreeSBIE Developer, Gentoo Developer, GUFI Staff
There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
We don't believe this to be a coincidence. -- Jeremy S. Anderson
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2009-02-25 16:10 [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA bashism check on portage Timothy Redaelli
2009-02-25 22:45 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-02-26 9:27 99% ` Timothy Redaelli
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox