public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Search results ordered by [date|relevance]  view[summary|nested|Atom feed]
thread overview below | download: 
* [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-nfp] Nominations open for the 2007/08 Trustees
       [not found]     ` <1184619644.15799.37.camel@hangover.linbsd.net>
@ 2007-07-17 15:08 99%   ` Grant Goodyear
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Grant Goodyear @ 2007-07-17 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: gentoo-nfp

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2215 bytes --]

Ned Ludd wrote: [Mon Jul 16 2007, 04:00:44PM CDT]
> Long term I worry about the foundation. No offense to anybody. I'm sure 
> I don't know or understand the problems you/we have encountered along
> the way. But I think we need to face it 99.9% of our devs are not
> suited to run a foundation such as this. That's not a bad thing in any
> such way. Most of us came to this project cuz we are geeks doing geeky
> things is what we do best.. 
> I'm sure some of you get roped into doing the foundation because
> you truly love Gentoo and want to see things be taken care of. However
> to be frank. I don't think I've seen a single substantial thing
> accomplished sense cshields left Gentoo. Please don't take that the
> wrong way. I know we are all busy people. Perhaps you guys have done
> shitloads and I/we just don't know about it. Perhaps it's still the same
> old story.. We are waiting on ABC banks. We can't re-incorp without 
> XYZ first.

Actually, we have a bank, paypal successfully talks to it, and 
I believe that we're completely caught up w/ all of the various funding
requests that we've received.  You're point is still a good one, 
however.

> Anyway point I'm trying to make here is that I think we might be 
> better off using a 3rd party as our foundation. IE people who have 
> the experience/motivation and time to focus on such things 
> that a foundation should be.
> 
> Anyway. I'd like to nominate nobody in-house.

Yeah, I tend to agree.  Not-so-coincidentally, Gentoo's been invited to
join the Software Freedom Conservancy, which would provide just the sort
of 3rd-party management that you're suggesting.  I put a write-up on my
blog detailing what we know so far:

    http://www.grantgoodyear.org/g2blog/gentoo/20070717-sflc.html

I'm cross-posting to -dev, and suggesting that comments be sent 
there as well, since most people don't read -nfp.

If you think this is a good idea, a bad idea, or you just want to know
more, now's the time to express your opinion.

-g2boojum-
-- 
Grant Goodyear	
Gentoo Developer
g2boojum@gentoo.org
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0  9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[relevance 99%]

Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2007-07-13 17:54     [gentoo-dev] Nominations open for the 2007/08 Trustees Chris Gianelloni
     [not found]     ` <1184619644.15799.37.camel@hangover.linbsd.net>
2007-07-17 15:08 99%   ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-nfp] " Grant Goodyear

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox