* Re: [gentoo-dev] first council meeting
@ 2005-09-16 21:41 99% ` Patrick Lauer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Patrick Lauer @ 2005-09-16 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 583 bytes --]
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 22:34 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > There is a difference between using package.mask and ~arch for
> > ebuilds. The use of ~arch denotes an ebuild requires testing. The use
> > of package.mask denotes that the application or library itself is
> > deemed unstable.
> | Second: a) and b) doesn't match what's going on with large parts of
> | the tree
>
> Good time for package maintainers to start following policy properly,
> eh?
Good time for policy to be adapted to match reality ;-)
--
Stand still, and let the rest of the universe move
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2005-09-15 20:51 [gentoo-dev] first council meeting Aron Griffis
2005-09-16 20:17 ` Carsten Lohrke
2005-09-16 20:38 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-09-16 21:23 ` Carsten Lohrke
2005-09-16 21:34 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-09-16 21:41 99% ` Patrick Lauer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox