* Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role
@ 2006-02-28 17:30 99% ` Jakub Moc
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Jakub Moc @ 2006-02-28 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Ciaran McCreesh
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1551 bytes --]
28.2.2006, 18:09:54, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:00:03 +0100 Jakub Moc <jakub@gentoo.org> wrote:
| >> PVR includes the revision of an ebuild. This means that if a
| >> revbump is made on a webapp package to fix a critical flaw, users
| >> will still have the old broken package installed too. This is
| >> especially relevant for security issues, but also applies to other
| >> kinds of fix.
> |
> | Not including the revision into the SLOT can break the apps by
> | removing the needed files from a live site... I still can't see any
> | *QA* violation there.
> Again, that's a design flaw. It's an eclass that's abusing SLOT, thus
> it's a QA issue.
OK, so kernel-2.eclass is abusing the slot as well, go scream on kernel
devs.
> | Yeah, it checks for that since that's the way the eclass is designed.
> | You can't declare a slot in a kernel ebuild either.
> One is a design flaw. The other is not.
Ah, tell me about the dual standards :P
> | Well, starts to be boring - so, either come with something valid from
> | QA standpoint or stop now.
> This is a valid issue from a QA standpoint. This is also why I'm not
> going to waste my time doing a proper list -- rather than addressing
> issues, they are being passed off as irrelevant or even features.
Next time, rather think a couple of times up before claiming something very
broken on a public mailing list where you have no proof for such claims.
Will be immensely helpful for everyone involved.
Thanks.
--
jakub
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 183 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2006-02-26 22:22 [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role Mark Loeser
2006-02-26 23:48 ` Stuart Herbert
2006-02-27 0:34 ` Mark Loeser
2006-02-27 9:00 ` Stuart Herbert
2006-02-27 17:08 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-02-27 20:26 ` Stuart Herbert
2006-02-27 20:37 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-02-27 20:49 ` Re[2]: " Jakub Moc
2006-02-27 21:33 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-02-28 9:38 ` Re[2]: " Jakub Moc
2006-02-28 14:52 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-02-28 15:12 ` Patrick Lauer
2006-02-28 15:26 ` Re[2]: " Jakub Moc
2006-02-28 15:42 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-02-28 16:11 ` Patrick Lauer
2006-02-28 16:35 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-02-28 17:00 ` Re[2]: " Jakub Moc
2006-02-28 17:09 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-02-28 17:30 99% ` Re[2]: " Jakub Moc
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox