* Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy
@ 2014-01-17 15:02 99% ` Rich Freeman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Rich Freeman @ 2014-01-17 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:02 PM, <grozin@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> Maybe, a good solution is to introduce a special arch, "noarch", for such
>> packages (similar to what's done in the rpm world). Then, if a package is
>> ~noarch, it is automatically considered ~arch for all arches. Similar for
>> stable. The maintainer should be able to keyword ~noarch and to stabilize
>> noarch. Comments?
>>
> There's been opposition to this in the past, but I'm in favor of
> giving this a shot.
>
I too think it is at least worth a try. We can learn from this either
way. Maybe start out leaving it up to maintainer discretion, and if
that becomes an issue we can try to formulate guidelines.
Rich
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2014-01-14 21:37 [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy William Hubbs
2014-01-15 11:30 ` Sergey Popov
2014-01-15 15:30 ` William Hubbs
2014-01-16 6:17 ` Sergey Popov
2014-01-17 6:06 ` grozin
2014-01-17 7:02 ` grozin
2014-01-17 7:58 ` Matt Turner
2014-01-17 15:02 99% ` Rich Freeman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox