* Re: [gentoo-dev] License advice
@ 2006-02-28 14:13 99% ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò @ 2006-02-28 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 656 bytes --]
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 14:46, Martin Ehmsen wrote:
> Should I require a public statement from the authors, like an update
> version on ctan that states the license, or is it enough to refer to the
> bug report? (ie., is it enough that the reporter says that the author
> said the package is public-domain?)
The best thing is probably if the authors can change that directly on CTAN or
if the reporter can provide a signed statement with a public key that is
recognized to be of one of the authors at least.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 191 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2006-02-28 13:46 [gentoo-dev] License advice Martin Ehmsen
2006-02-28 14:13 99% ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox