* Re: [gentoo-dev] dummy-sources
@ 2003-07-26 3:26 99% ` Dave Nellans
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Dave Nellans @ 2003-07-26 3:26 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Brad Laue; +Cc: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1031 bytes --]
I agree with brad, I proposed the emerge inject solution was how this
problem was intended to be dealt with but couldn't quite make sense of
the reason this didn't work from the thread.
could someone possibly clearly give the arguement against injecting
again for us slow people?
dave
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 20:22, Brad Laue wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > so ! last call, does anyone really trully hate the idea of dummy-sources ?
> > if not i'm going to go ahead and add it to the tree
> > - -mike
>
> It doesn't make any sense. If the original poster uses custom-patched
> kernels, surely he can create his custom-patches against vanilla-sources?
>
> It seems to me that dummy-sources would be duplicating emerge -i
> functionality if no true sources are to be installed, and would be
> duplicating vanilla-sources if untouched sources are to be installed.
>
> Brad
>
>
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
--
Dave Nellans
http://lucy.wox.org/~dnellans/
dnellans@cs.utah.edu
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2003-07-24 14:43 [gentoo-dev] dummy-sources Florian Huber
2003-07-24 15:15 ` Florian Huber
2003-07-24 15:37 ` Georgi Georgiev
2003-07-26 2:01 ` Mike Frysinger
2003-07-26 2:22 ` Brad Laue
2003-07-26 3:26 99% ` Dave Nellans
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox