* Re: [gentoo-dev] doinst recursive?
@ 2002-06-04 14:41 99% ` Marko Mikulicic
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Marko Mikulicic @ 2002-06-04 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Grant Goodyear wrote:
>>I was wondering if switching to CVS would only update the ebuilds or
>>also update (relax) the maskings. In other words, it is safe to
>> sync the portage tree with gentoo cvs ?
>
>
> Yep. The anoncvs and rsync servers return exactly the same files.
So, if I did emerge rsync and the acroread bug was still there,
the bug was obviously not fixed (or I didn't get the last release).
The bug fixes should differ in -r? .
The revision I have is acroread-5.05-r3.ebuild.
It contains the following code snippet:
for i in Browsers Reader Resource
do
insinto ${INSTALLDIR}
doins ${i}/*
done
It should copy recursively the Browser, Reader and Resource
subdirectories in ${INSTALLDIR}, but instead a warning is issued.
(reasonable, since it uses "/bin/install" and it doesn't copy recursively).
I have fixed it adding:
cp -r Browsers Reader Resource ${D}/${INSTALLDIR}
just below.
Can you explain me why is preferred to use doins instead of cp ...
${D}/${INSTALLDIR}? If I have sources of a package it is safe to use a
"emake install" (configuring it previously with something like
--prefix=${D}/usr) ?
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2002-06-04 12:06 [gentoo-dev] doinst recursive? Marko Mikulicic
2002-06-04 12:21 ` Dan Naumov
2002-06-04 12:42 ` Marko Mikulicic
2002-06-04 13:08 ` Paul de Vrieze
2002-06-04 13:45 ` Marko Mikulicic
2002-06-04 14:00 ` Dan Naumov
2002-06-04 14:16 ` Marko Mikulicic
2002-06-04 14:22 ` Grant Goodyear
2002-06-04 14:41 99% ` Marko Mikulicic
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox