* Re: [gentoo-dev] The usefulness of test in FEATURES
@ 2005-04-30 17:45 99% ` Jason Stubbs
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Jason Stubbs @ 2005-04-30 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 997 bytes --]
On Sunday 01 May 2005 02:32, Maurice van der Pot wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 06:30:05PM +0300, Rumen Yotov wrote:
> > a day or two ago mentioned that i'm using per-package FEATURES in
> > '/etc/portage/package.features-file' ("-collision-protect") so was
> > thinking about doing the same for "test" (for half a day "test" is ON in
> > my 'make.conf'). Think of putting it OFF for failing packages while
> > still keeping it ON globally. Also will like the get some opinions.
>
> It would be a shame if every user would have to find out for himself
> which packages need "-test". Additionally, when the tests are fixed,
> the package will still not be using them. It would be nice if something
> like package.features could become not only part of portage, but also
> of the profiles.
package.features is not part of portage, nor will it be for some time to come
due to the issues outlined in my other response. RESTRICT="test" is viable
though.
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2005-04-30 13:48 [gentoo-dev] The usefulness of test in FEATURES Maurice van der Pot
2005-04-30 15:30 ` Rumen Yotov
2005-04-30 17:32 ` Maurice van der Pot
2005-04-30 17:45 99% ` Jason Stubbs
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox