public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Search results ordered by [date|relevance]  view[summary|nested|Atom feed]
thread overview below | download: 
* Re: [gentoo-dev] making the stable tree more up-to-date
  @ 2011-12-16 10:42 99% ` justin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: justin @ 2011-12-16 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 667 bytes --]

Hi,

I really like that you open all those bugs. But it makes no sense to add
arches after a "time out". At least not after a such a short one. The
maintainer is responsible for the package, that means it is their
responsibility to decide that a package should go stable. In addition
they have to make the package fit to the standards that the arch teams
request. And I can tell from my own experience it is always more than
the average package has. So as long as you don't review the packages
yourself, consider a different proceeding than this timeout.

Please remove all added arches from the packages maintained by all sci*
teams.

Thanks justin


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 259 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[relevance 99%]

Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2011-11-21  8:41     [gentoo-dev] making the stable tree more up-to-date "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2011-12-16 10:42 99% ` justin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox