* Re: [gentoo-dev] first council meeting
@ 2005-09-16 20:44 99% ` Ciaran McCreesh
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Ciaran McCreesh @ 2005-09-16 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 965 bytes --]
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 16:33:13 -0400 Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
wrote:
| ok, e17 packages dont count here. however, your hardcore view i
| still dont buy. how about the baselayout-1.9.x -> baselayout-1.11.x
| stabilization process ? are you telling me that arch teams should
| have had the power to move those into stable without talking to the
| maintainer ? baselayout may be a core package, but if you continue
| with your hard rule here, then it doesnt matter.
I'm saying that arch teams should be allowed to mark it stable if they
think it's appropriate. Not that it must be moved to stable after $x
days, but that it can be at the arch team's discretion. And any arch
team which is silly enough to mark a broken baselayout stable has far
bigger problems anyway...
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2005-09-15 20:51 [gentoo-dev] first council meeting Aron Griffis
2005-09-16 19:15 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-09-16 19:34 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-09-16 20:33 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-09-16 20:44 99% ` Ciaran McCreesh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox