* Re: [gentoo-dev] Some 'proper coding' notes for ebuilds
@ 2003-08-03 15:30 99% ` Martin Schlemmer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Martin Schlemmer @ 2003-08-03 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw
To: vapier; +Cc: Gentoo-Dev, Nick Jones
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 670 bytes --]
On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 04:38, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> oooooooooh and stop trying to run the `patch` cmd yourself ...
>
> no one is cooler than `epatch` (which is integrated into portage now, so dont
> 'inherit eutils'), so stop trying to think you ppl are
>
On a side note: The whole idea of having epatch, etc in a eclass,
and not portage, was to be able to propagate fixes without a need
for a new portage. If it really needs to be inside portage, can
portage just automatically inherit eutils.eclass (or whatever),
and not hardcode it ?
--
Martin Schlemmer
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer
Cape Town, South Africa
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2003-08-03 2:29 [gentoo-dev] Some 'proper coding' notes for ebuilds Mike Frysinger
2003-08-03 2:34 ` Mike Frysinger
2003-08-03 2:38 ` Mike Frysinger
2003-08-03 15:30 99% ` Martin Schlemmer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox