* Re: [gentoo-dev] reason for dhcpcd in system profile ?
@ 2003-08-24 8:59 99% ` Spider
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Spider @ 2003-08-24 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 862 bytes --]
begin quote
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 23:21:37 -0400 (EDT)
"A. Craig West" <acwest-gentoo-dev@craigwest.net> wrote:
> You bring up too good points. What, exactly, is the definition of
> system? If it is 'everything you need to have a network connected box,
> so you can go get anything else you need" then I DO think PPPoE should
> be in it, and maybe ppp or whatever is current in the way of dial-up.
> They are both quite equivalent to dhcpcd, and neither is all that big,
> I don't think. The real question is, what is System?
Shouldn't system be as close to a POSIX compliant Unix as possible? Or
perhaps LSB? If others want minimalism, let them create their own
profiles?(Its not difficult. really).
//Spider
--
begin .signature
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2003-08-23 19:04 [gentoo-dev] reason for dhcpcd in system profile ? Marius Mauch
2003-08-23 19:20 ` Wolfram Schlich
2003-08-23 23:06 ` Luke-Jr
2003-08-24 3:21 ` A. Craig West
2003-08-24 8:59 99% ` Spider
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox