* Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: lzma tarball usage
@ 2008-05-07 14:12 99% ` Natanael Copa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Natanael Copa @ 2008-05-07 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 16:23 +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> I'd be happy if some other unpacker is used than lzma-utils - one that
> does not depend on libstdc++ - I'm sure it can be done, heck it's done
> in integrated form in some other projects in less than a couple
> kilobytes of code for the unpacking from a VFS. Meanwhile please
> consider using the upstream provided .tar.gz tarballs instead and not
> roll patchsets in .lzma just cause you can.
busybox has unlzma and seems to be a part of "system".
Should also be easy to create a really tiny unlzma from the busybox
source and ship with portage, or create a patch for tar or something.
-nc
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2008-05-07 13:23 [gentoo-dev] RFC: lzma tarball usage Mart Raudsepp
2008-05-07 14:12 99% ` Natanael Copa
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox