* Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA bashism check on portage
@ 2009-02-26 9:32 99% ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2009-02-26 9:32 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Timothy Redaelli; +Cc: gentoo-dev
On Thursday 26 February 2009 04:27:44 Timothy Redaelli wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 February 2009 23:45:41 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i recall it being incorrect in some cases (it checked for what dash
> > supports, not what POSIX supports), but that was a while ago, so maybe my
> > experience is dated at this point. otherwise, integrating it sounds sane
> > to me, and if we can push fixes back to debian, even better.
>
> It does not fail, the problem is that some construct works only on some
> shells or systems (for example type and kill -HUP warnings).
>
> Maybe we should add a getopt flag (-q for example) to mask that types of
> warnings, or maybe we should (for Gentoo/Alt) adapt files to be (almost)
> POSIX compliant (so command -v instead of type, kill -s HUP instead of
> kill -HUP, and go on)
i'm totally not following. we were talking about POSIX shell syntax, but now
you're talking about utilities as well ?
-mike
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2009-02-25 16:10 [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA bashism check on portage Timothy Redaelli
2009-02-25 22:45 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-02-26 9:27 ` Timothy Redaelli
2009-02-26 9:32 99% ` Mike Frysinger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox