* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] "etc-update" versus Manual update opinions..
@ 2003-09-17 15:46 99% ` Chris Gianelloni
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Chris Gianelloni @ 2003-09-17 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Stroller; +Cc: gentoo-user, gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 806 bytes --]
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 11:02, Stroller wrote:
> On 17 Sep 2003, at 1:24 pm, Gwendolyn van der Linden wrote:
>
> > brett holcomb [mailto:brettholcomb@charter.net] wrote:
> >
> >> Well, if you use etc-update on files like /etc/fstab your
> >> system will break.
> >
> > Exactly. I would vote for keeping /etc/fstab.example in portage, and
> > making the copying/editing part of the installation procedure (cp
> > /etc/fstab.example /etc/fstab; nano -w /etc/fstab).
>
> I agree. I wouldn't be surprised if this was changed, were you to file
> it as a bug. I'm cross posting to gentoo-dev to see what they think.
>
> Stroller.
I think it is a great idea.
You definitely have my support.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Developer, Gentoo Linux
Games Team
Is your power animal a pengiun?
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
[not found] <OLEMJKKJBJMMNIPIEKLLGENIDBAA.Gwendolyn.van.der.Linden@technolution.nl>
2003-09-17 15:02 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] "etc-update" versus Manual update opinions Stroller
2003-09-17 15:46 99% ` Chris Gianelloni
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox