public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Search results ordered by [date|relevance]  view[summary|nested|Atom feed]
thread overview below | download: 
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Some 'proper coding' notes for ebuilds
  @ 2003-08-03 20:34 99%     ` Stuart Herbert
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Stuart Herbert @ 2003-08-03 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: George Shapovalov, gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: signed data --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1733 bytes --]

On Sunday 03 August 2003 9:27 pm, George Shapovalov wrote:
> Well, looks like there is no one around who remembers this thing, so I
> guess I'll chime in:

;-)

> While not really used nowadays, lintool is still a
> usefull tool, albeit unmaintained :(.  

As a new developer, I've been told repeatedly that lintool is not worth using.  
Heck, it even says that in the Ebuild howto on the website, iirc.

> There has been a discussion of this issue, I believe over a year ago
> already. It has been decided that this indeed is a serious issue, worth
> being brought into the policy (main reason I beleive was to settle the
> never-ending debates). everybody agreed that it should be either all spaces
> or all tabs (I hope nobody would want it otherwise nowadays?)

Urgh ;-)

Although, I will admit, that most ebuilds are trivial enough to be indented 
using just tabs.

> Oh, should I mention that I am on a tabbed side ;)?

I'd never have guessed ;-)

> Above makes this a non-issue, and as I described in the beginning we do
> have that enforceent and we put it in place upon discussing alternatives
> and on purpose.

Second urgh.

What's next - forcing people to use emacs over vi, or vice versa? ;-)  
Seriously, I refer you back to my previous post about why engineers use 
coding standards.

Best regards,
Stu
-- 
Stuart Herbert                                              stuart@gentoo.org
Gentoo Developer                                       http://www.gentoo.org/
Beta packages for download            http://dev.gentoo.org/~stuart/packages/

GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu
Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319  C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C
--

[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[relevance 99%]

Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2003-08-03  2:29     [gentoo-dev] Some 'proper coding' notes for ebuilds Mike Frysinger
2003-08-03 18:53     ` Stuart Herbert
2003-08-03 20:27       ` George Shapovalov
2003-08-03 20:34 99%     ` Stuart Herbert

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox