* Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving the updated apache and associated ebuilds back into package.mask
@ 2005-04-21 13:13 99% ` Paul de Vrieze
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Paul de Vrieze @ 2005-04-21 13:13 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 813 bytes --]
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 17:25, Christian Parpart wrote:
>
> I might be wrong, but... I do not think that this will be easily
> possible, because all modules would have to deel with this, too.
>
>
> Besides all this, suppose the case that we've an apache httpd 2.1-line
> would in the trees, someone emerged it (though, don't have 2.0.x
> installed), is there be a way to get subversion with +apache2 useflag
> installed? apache-2.1 needs latest apr/apr-util's, I just hope that
> this wouldn't crash in any way.
The subversion people kind of live on the bleeding edge. I'm quite sure
that they will support the newest apr/apr-util. I do know for certain
that they support apr-1.0.0.
Paul
--
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2005-04-16 5:56 [gentoo-dev] Moving the updated apache and associated ebuilds back into package.mask Elfyn McBratney
2005-04-20 8:59 ` Paul de Vrieze
2005-04-20 15:25 ` Christian Parpart
2005-04-21 13:13 99% ` Paul de Vrieze
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox