* Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving more hardening features to default?
@ 2011-10-25 14:18 99% ` Kacper Kowalik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Kacper Kowalik @ 2011-10-25 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 780 bytes --]
W dniu 20.10.2011 10:47, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." pisze:
> I've noticed
> <http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/SecurityHardeningBuildFlags>, i.e.
> Debian is starting to make more and more hardening features default, at
> least for most packages.
>
> Should we start doing that too? What are possible problems with that? It
> seems like it's mostly about USE=hardened, right?
Hi,
just a bunch of quick questions from a hardened newbie:
1) Is there are reason to do it beside "Debian is going to do it"?
2) What's wrong with current approach i.e. having seperate hardened profile?
3) What are the benefits for an average desktop user or high-performance
cluster?
While answering that, please skip things obvious like having "more
secure box".
Cheers,
Kacper
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 900 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2011-10-20 8:47 [gentoo-dev] Moving more hardening features to default? "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2011-10-25 14:18 99% ` Kacper Kowalik
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox